Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19136509›Full record

ArticleGut2009

Serum pepsinogens and risk of gastric and oesophageal cancers in the General Population Nutrition Intervention Trial cohort.

J-S Ren, F Kamangar, Y-L Qiao, P R Taylor, H Liang, S M Dawsey, B Liu, J-H Fan, C C Abnet

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A non-invasive method for the diagnosis of upper GI diseases.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. [Combined assessment of gastric mucosal damage associated withZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Serum Pepsinogen as a Biomarker for Gastric Cancer in the United States: A Nested Case-Control Study Using the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial Data.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  20. A Predictive Model of Noncardia Gastric Adenocarcinoma Risk Using Antibody Response to Helicobacter pylori Proteins and Pepsinogen.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J-S RenCancer Institute of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
F Kamangar
Y-L Qiao
P R Taylor
H Liang
S M Dawsey
B Liu
J-H Fan
C C Abnet
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNNational Cancer Institute · USCancer Genetics (United States) · US

Funding

Nutrition Intervention Trials in Linxian ChinaZIACP000112 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ABNET, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2025
$8.2M
STUDIES OF THE REGULATION OF IGA IMMUNOGLOBULIN SYNTHESISZ01AI000356 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI STROBER, WARREN · 1985 to 1999
–
CCR NIH HHS N01 RC047701CCR NIH HHS N01 RC047702Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP000112NCI NIH HHS N01-SC-91030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLow serum pepsinogen I (PGI) and low pepsinogen I/pepsinogen II ratio (PGI/II ratio) are markers of gastric fundic atrophy. We aimed to prospectively test the association between serum PGI/II ratio and risks of gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma, gastric cardia adenocarcinoma, and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

designCase-cohort study nested in a prospective cohort with over 15 years of follow-up.

settingRural region of the People's Republic of China. SUBJECTS: Men and women aged 40-69 years at study baseline.

main outcome measuresAdjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between serum PGI/II ratio and cancer risk.

resultsCompared to subjects with PGI/II ratio of >4, those with <or=4 had hazard ratios (HRs) (95% CIs) of 2.72 (1.77 to 4.20) and 2.12 (1.42 to 3.16) for non-cardia and cardia gastric adenocarcinomas, respectively. Risk of both cancers was also increased when we used other cut points ranging from 3 to 6, or quartile models, or nonlinear continuous models. Risk of OSCC was marginally increased in those with PGI/II ratio <or=4, with HR (95% CI) of 1.56 (0.99 to 2.47), but quartile models and continuous models showed no increased risk. The nonlinear continuous models suggested that any single cut point collapsed subjects with dissimilar gastric adenocarcinoma risks, and that using cut points was not an efficient use of data in evaluating these associations.

conclusionIn this prospective study, we found similar and significantly increased risks of non-cardia and cardia gastric adenocarcinomas in subjects with low PGI/II ratio but little evidence for an association with the risk of OSCC.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAtrophyBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellCardiaCase-Control StudiesChinaCohort StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioBiomarkers, TumorPepsinogen APepsinogen C

Identifiers

PMID19136509
PMCPMC2792746
OpenAlexW2096020759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.