Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19135438›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2009

EphA4 and EfnB2a maintain rhombomere coherence by independently regulating intercalation of progenitor cells in the zebrafish neural keel.

Hilary A Kemp, Julie E Cooke, Cecilia B Moens

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Genes · 2022
    Article
  5. Segmentation and patterning of the vertebrate hindbrain.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cell segregation in the vertebrate hindbrain: a matter of boundaries.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hilary A KempHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Division of Basic Science, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, B2-152, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98109, P.O. Box 19024, USA.
Julie E Cooke
Cecilia B Moens
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

GENETIC MECHANISMS OF HINDBRAIN SEGMENTATIONR01HD037909 · NICHD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MOENS, CECILIA B · 1999 to 2009
$2.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNICHD NIH HHS HD37909NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During vertebrate development, the hindbrain is transiently segmented into 7 distinct rhombomeres (r). Hindbrain segmentation takes place within the context of the complex morphogenesis required for neurulation, which in zebrafish involves a characteristic cross-midline division that distributes progenitor cells bilaterally in the forming neural tube. The Eph receptor tyrosine kinase EphA4 and the membrane-bound Ephrin (Efn) ligand EfnB2a, which are expressed in complementary segments in the early hindbrain, are required for rhombomere boundary formation. We showed previously that EphA4 promotes cell-cell affinity within r3 and r5, and proposed that preferential adhesion within rhombomeres contributes to boundary formation. Here we show that EfnB2a is similarly required in r4 for normal cell affinity and that EphA4 and EfnB2a regulate cell affinity independently within their respective rhombomeres. Live imaging of cell sorting in mosaic embryos shows that both proteins function during cross-midline cell divisions in the hindbrain neural keel. Consistent with this, mosaic EfnB2a over-expression causes widespread cell sorting and disrupts hindbrain organization, but only if induced at or before neural keel stage. We propose a model in which Eph and Efn-dependent cell affinity within rhombomeres serve to maintain rhombomere organization during the potentially disruptive process of teleost neurulation.

Indexed as

RhombencephalonZebrafishAnimalsCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell DivisionEphrin-B2FemaleHumansMaleMorphogenesisMosaicismReceptor, EphA4Spindle ApparatusStem CellsZebrafish ProteinsEphrin-B2Receptor, EphA4Zebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19135438
PMCPMC2861865
OpenAlexW1995444755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.