Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19135286›Full record

Trial reportSocial science & medicine (1982)2009

Spatial and environmental connectivity analysis in a cholera vaccine trial.

Michael Emch, Mohammad Ali, Elisabeth D Root, Mohammad Yunus

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social science & medicine (1982), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Oral vaccines for preventing cholera.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Herd Protection from Drinking Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2016
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael EmchDepartment of Geography, University of North Carolina, Saunders Hall, Campus Box 3220, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3220, USA. emch@mail.unc.edu
Mohammad Ali
Elisabeth D Root
Mohammad Yunus

Funding

Geographical Analysis in Vaccine Efficacy TrialsR03AI053214 · NIAID · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI EMCH, MICHAEL E · 2002 to 2003
$116k
NIAID NIH HHS 1R03 AI 53214-01NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI053214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper develops theory and methods for vaccine trials that utilize spatial and environmental information. Satellite imagery is used to identify whether households are connected to one another via water bodies in a study area in rural Bangladesh. Then relationships between neighborhood-level cholera vaccine coverage and placebo incidence and neighborhood-level spatial variables are measured. The study hypothesis is that unvaccinated people who are environmentally connected to people who have been vaccinated will be at lower risk compared to unvaccinated people who are environmentally connected to people who have not been vaccinated. We use four datasets including: a cholera vaccine trial database, a longitudinal demographic database of the rural population from which the vaccine trial participants were selected, a household-level geographic information system (GIS) database of the same study area, and high resolution Quickbird satellite imagery. An environmental connectivity metric was constructed by integrating the satellite imagery with the vaccine and demographic databases linked with GIS. The results show that there is a relationship between neighborhood rates of cholera vaccination and placebo incidence. Thus, people are indirectly protected when more people in their environmentally connected neighborhood are vaccinated. This result is similar to our previous work that used a simpler Euclidean distance neighborhood to measure neighborhood vaccine coverage [Ali, M., Emch, M., von Seidlein, L., Yunus, M., Sack, D. A., Holmgren, J., et al. (2005). Herd immunity conferred by killed oral cholera vaccines in Bangladesh. Lancet, 366(9479), 44-49]. Our new method of measuring environmental connectivity is more precise since it takes into account the transmission mode of cholera and therefore this study validates our assertion that the oral cholera vaccine provides indirect protection in addition to direct protection.

Indexed as

Geographic Information SystemsImmunity, HerdModels, BiologicalResidence CharacteristicsRiversAdolescentAdultBangladeshChildChild, PreschoolCholera VaccinesClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleHumansMaleOdds RatioCholera VaccinesPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID19135286
PMCPMC2677518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.