Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19134471›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2009

Diffusion, exclusion, and specific binding in a large channel: a study of OmpF selectivity inversion.

Antonio Alcaraz, Ekaterina M Nestorovich, M Lidón López, Elena García-Giménez, Sergey M Bezrukov, Vicente M Aguilella

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio AlcarazDepartamento de Física, Universitat Jaume I, 12080 Castellón, Spain.
Ekaterina M Nestorovich
M Lidón López
Elena García-Giménez
Sergey M Bezrukov
Vicente M Aguilella
Universitat Jaume I · ESEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · US

Funding

Biophysics of Large Membrane ChannelsZIAHD000072 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI BEZRUKOV, SERGEY M · 2009 to 2025
$22.8M
Biophysics of Large Membrane ChannelsZ01HD000072 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI BEZRUKOV, SERGEY M · 2004 to 2008
$1.6M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We find that moderate cationic selectivity of the general bacterial porin OmpF in sodium and potassium chloride solutions is inversed to anionic selectivity in concentrated solutions of barium, calcium, nickel, and magnesium chlorides. To understand the origin of this phenomenon, we consider several factors, which include the binding of divalent cations, electrostatic and steric exclusion of differently charged and differently sized ions, size-dependent hydrodynamic hindrance, electrokinetic effects, and significant "anionic" diffusion potential for bulk solutions of chlorides of divalent cations. Though all these factors contribute to the measured selectivity of this large channel, the observed selectivity inversion is mostly due to the following two. First, binding divalent cations compensates, or even slightly overcompensates, for the negative charge of the OmpF protein, which is known to be the main cause of cationic selectivity in sodium and potassium chloride solutions. Second, the higher anionic (versus cationic) transport rate expected for bulk solutions of chloride salts of divalent cations is the leading cause of the measured anionic selectivity of the channel. Interestingly, at high concentrations the binding of cations does not show any pronounced specificity within the divalent series because the reversal potentials measured in the series correlate well with the corresponding bulk diffusion potentials. Thus our study shows that, in contrast to the highly selective channels of neurophysiology that employ mostly the exclusion mechanism, quite different factors account for the selectivity of large channels. The elucidation of these factors is essential for understanding large channel selectivity and its regulation in vivo.

Indexed as

AnionsCationsDiffusionEscherichia coliLipid BilayersMembrane PotentialsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPorinsProtein BindingSaltsStatic ElectricityAnionsCationsLipid BilayersOmpF proteinPorinsSalts

Identifiers

PMID19134471
PMCPMC2710040
OpenAlexW1997641437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.