Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19134224›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2009

Conservation in the face of diversity: multistrain analysis of an intracellular bacterium.

Michael J Dark, David R Herndon, Lowell S Kappmeyer, Mikel P Gonzales, Elizabeth Nordeen, Guy H Palmer, Donald P Knowles, Kelly A Brayton

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Immunization withVaccines · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. First Whole Genome Sequence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Segmental Variation in a DuplicatedInfection and immunity · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antigenic Variation in Bacterial Pathogens.Microbiology spectrum · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael J DarkProgram in Genomics, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-7040, USA. darkmich@wsu.edu
David R Herndon
Lowell S Kappmeyer
Mikel P Gonzales
Elizabeth Nordeen
Guy H Palmer
Donald P Knowles
Kelly A Brayton

Funding

Infectious Diseases and Microbial Immunology Training ProgramT32AI007025 · NIAID · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Thomas H KAWULA, M KARIUKI NJENGA · 1985 to 2026
$7.4M
Anaplasma marginale genes determinning tick transmissionK08AI064162 · NIAID · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DARK, MICHAEL JAMES · 2005 to 2007
$224k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI064162NIAID NIH HHS K08-AI64162NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007025Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust GR075800M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the recent completion of numerous sequenced bacterial genomes, notable advances have been made in understanding the level of conservation between various species. However, relatively little is known about the genomic diversity among strains. We determined the complete genome sequence of the Florida strain of Anaplasma marginale, and near complete (>96%) sequences for an additional three strains, for comparative analysis with the previously fully sequenced St. Maries strain genome.

resultsThese comparisons revealed that A. marginale has a closed-core genome with few highly plastic regions, which include the msp2 and msp3 genes, as well as the aaap locus. Comparison of the Florida and St. Maries genome sequences found that SNPs comprise 0.8% of the longer Florida genome, with 33.5% of the total SNPs between all five strains present in at least two strains and 3.0% of SNPs present in all strains except Florida. Comparison of genomes from three strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Bacillus anthracis, and Nessieria meningiditis, as well as four Chlamydophila pneumoniae strains found that 98.8%-100% of SNPs are unique to each strain, suggesting A. marginale, with 76.0%, has an intermediate level of strain-specific SNPs. Comparison of genomes from other organisms revealed variation in diversity that did not segregate with the environmental niche the bacterium occupies, ranging from 0.00% to 8.00% of the larger pairwise-compared genome.

conclusionAnalysis of multiple A. marginale strains suggests intracellular bacteria have more variable SNP retention rates than previously reported, and may have closed-core genomes in response to the host organism environment and/or reductive evolution.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnaplasma marginaleChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialConserved SequenceDNA, BacterialEvolution, MolecularGenomic LibraryOpen Reading FramesPhenotypePhysical Chromosome MappingSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID19134224
PMCPMC2649000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.