ReviewCellular microbiology2009
Live cell fluorescence microscopy to study microbial pathogenesis.
Review in Cellular microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-range enhancement for fluorescence and Raman spectroscopy using Ag nanoislands protected with column-structured silica overlayer.Light, science & applications · 2024Article
- Modeling Microbial Community Networks: Methods and Tools for Studying Microbial Interactions.Microbial ecology · 2024Review
- Label-free and noninvasive analysis of microorganism surface epistructures at the single-cell level.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Enzyme-targeted fluorescent small-molecule probes for bacterial imaging.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2020Review
- Bioimaging structural signatures of the oomycete pathogen Sclerospora graminicola in pearl millet using different microscopic techniques.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Contribution of high-content imaging technologies to the development of anti-infective drugs.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2016Review
- Article
- Deep-red fluorescent imaging probe for bacteria.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2012Article
- Flavin mononucleotide (FMN)-based fluorescent protein (FbFP) as reporter for gene expression in the anaerobe Bacteroides fragilis.FEMS microbiology letters · 2011Article
- Noninvasive biophotonic imaging for studies of infectious disease.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2011Review
- How ubiquitination and autophagy participate in the regulation of the cell response to bacterial infection.Biology of the cell · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in microscopy and fluorescent probes provide new insight into the nanometer-scale biochemistry governing the interactions between eukaryotic cells and pathogens. When combined with mathematical modelling, these new technologies hold the promise of qualitative, quantitative and predictive descriptions of these pathways. Using the light microscope to study the spatial and temporal relationships between pathogens, host cells and their respective biochemical machinery requires an appreciation for how fluorescent probes and imaging devices function. This review summarizes how live cell fluorescence microscopy with common instruments can provide quantitative insight into the cellular and molecular functions of hosts and pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.