Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19132801›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2009

Vision disorders and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors: a review of the evidence to date.

Alan M Laties

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Treatment of Macular Degeneration with Sildenafil: Results of a Two-Year Trial.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2018
    Article
  10. Ocular toxicity assessment of chronic sildenafil therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2016
    Article
  11. Sildenafil and retinopathy of prematurity risk in very low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. [Pharmacological concepts to treat hereditary retinal degenerations].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2012
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors in vascular ischemia: A case report and review of their use in ischemic conditions.The Canadian journal of plastic surgery = Journal canadien de chirurgie plastique · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alan M LatiesScheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Laties@mail.med.upenn.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors (sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil) have been in widespread use for the safe and effective treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) for nearly a decade. During that time, a relatively small number of patients have experienced adverse visual events, including nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION). In this article, post-marketing reports of adverse visual events along with other relevant literature on ocular safety related to PDE-5 inhibitor use are reviewed. Although a relatively small number of cases have been reported with a possible temporal association with PDE-5 inhibitor use, it has not been possible to conclude whether these events are coincidental or whether they are associated with effects of PDE-5 inhibitors on ocular circulation or on other structures of the eye. A careful review of pooled data from clinical trials for all three PDE-5 inhibitors, which contain well documented information about the dose and duration of exposure to the drug for a large number of patients, yields no evidence for an increased risk of NAION or other adverse ocular events associated with PDE-5 inhibitor use. However, the inherent limitations in interpreting results from clinical trials and potentially incomplete information from post-marketing surveillance preclude a definitive declaration that ocular safety will not be a concern for some patients with ED and co-morbid disease states. Despite the absence of a proven link between PDE-5 use and serious ocular disorders, physicians should continue to advise patients to stop use of a PDE-5 inhibitor and seek immediate medical attention in the event of a sudden loss of vision as a safety measure.

Indexed as

Phosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsClinical Trials as TopicErectile DysfunctionHumansMalePhosphodiesterase InhibitorsRisk FactorsVision DisordersPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPhosphodiesterase Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.