ArticleDer Pathologe2009
[CUP syndrome: molecular pathogenesis and biology].
Article in Der Pathologe, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Structured diagnostics and therapy of the CUP syndrome].Der Radiologe · 2014Article
- An Unusual Case of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.Case reports in oncology · 2010Article
- [The initial CUP situation and CUP syndrome: pathological diagnostics].Der Pathologe · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is an intriguing clinical finding defined as biopsy-proven metastasis from a malignancy in the absence of an identifiable primary site after a complete clinical workup. CUP is a relatively common clinical entity, accounting for approximately 3-5% of all cancer diagnoses, and consists of a heterogeneous group of tumors that have acquired the capacity to metastasize before the development of a clinically evident primary lesion. The mechanisms responsible for early metastasis and lack of a detectable primary tumor are largely unknown. Although remarkable tools have been developed for immunohistological classification of CUP on the basis of the likely tissue of origin, data on molecular pathogenesis and biology of this disorder are rare. A wide variety of chromosomal aberrations are seen in CUP, with aberrations of chromosomes 1, 6, 7, and 11 having been most frequently described. 66-75% of CUP express epidermal growth factor receptor while overexpression of Her2/neu seems to be rare. In contrast to most other tumor entities p53 mutations have been found only in a minority of CUP tumors. Recently, several independent studies have demonstrated proof of principle for the use of gene expression microarrays in identifying a primary site for CUP. Therefore, gene expression and also genomic profiling tools represent promising analytical approaches to assist with the management of CUP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.