Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19132003›Full record

ReviewNature clinical practice. Urology2009

Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer--a review of current status and future promise.

Caroline M Moore, Doug Pendse, Mark Emberton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature clinical practice. Urology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 328 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. One-Pot Synthesis of Oxygen Vacancy-Rich Amorphous/Crystalline Heterophase CaWOAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Photodynamic Therapy: Past, Current, and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline M MooreNational Medical Laser Centre and Division of Surgical and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK. carolinemoore@doctors.org.uk
Doug Pendse
Mark Emberton
Royal London Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Debate is ongoing about the treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer, particularly in men who have low-risk disease detected by PSA screening. A balance is needed between the harms and benefits of treatment. New techniques are being developed that aim to offer similar treatment effects to current radical therapies, while reducing the associated harmful effects of these treatments. In this Review, we explore the potential of one such technique, photodynamic therapy (PDT), for the treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer. PDT uses a photosensitizing drug that is activated in the prostate by low-power laser light, delivered using optical fibers. The fibers are placed within needles in the prostate, guided by transrectal ultrasound and a perineal template. Following the activation of the photosensitizer by light, and the formation of reactive oxygen species, necrosis occurs at the site of interaction between the photosensitizer, light and oxygen. Clinical studies are underway to investigate the use of PDT for primary and salvage treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer. We review these studies, the potential strategies for enhanced photodynamic effects, and the current limitations of PDT for prostate cancer.

Indexed as

PhotochemotherapyBacteriochlorophyllsForecastingHumansMaleMesoporphyrinsPhotosensitizing AgentsProstatic NeoplasmsBacteriochlorophyllsMesoporphyrinspadeliporfinpalladium-bacteriopheophorbidePhotosensitizing Agentstemoporfin

Identifiers

PMID19132003
OpenAlexW2083703739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.