Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19131454›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2009

Using a quitline plus low-cost nicotine replacement therapy to help disadvantaged smokers to quit.

C L Miller, V Sedivy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01156610 (Tobacco Treatment Outreach to Reduce Disparities for Primary Care Populations), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01156610 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Tobacco Treatment Outreach to Reduce Disparities for Primary Care Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2011 to 2014Enrolled706ConditionsSmoking, Smoking CessationArmsTobacco Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for recruiting smokers into cessation programmes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Impact of Educational Attainment on Health Outcomes in Moderate to Severe CKD.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2016
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Evaluating the effect of access to free medication to quit smoking: a clinical trial testing the role of motivation.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Differential Relationship between Tobacco Control Policies and U.S. Adult Current Smoking by Poverty.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C L MillerThe Cancer Council South Australia, PO Box 929, Unley, South Australia 5061, Australia. cmiller@cancersa.org.au
V Sedivy
Cancer Council SA · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo trial an intervention in a real-life setting to motivate low-income smokers to try to quit. The intervention under trial was the addition of subsidised nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to a standard population quitline service.

designParticipants were low-income smokers, recruited "cold" via either a letter in the mail or a flyer inserted in a local newspaper. The intervention group received the usual service of multisession counselling from the quitline plus access to heavily subsidised NRT. A comparison group received the usual quitline service only. Participants were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months. Trial participants were also compared with a sample of general callers to the quitline.

resultsThe offer of subsidised NRT recruited more than twice as many low-income smokers than the offer of the cessation service alone (intervention group n = 1000; comparison group n = 377). 63% were first-time callers to the quitline. Intervention respondents showed higher levels of nicotine dependence than comparison group respondents. Comparisons of quitting data were confounded by the differences in the respondents at baseline. 73.5% of smokers in the intervention group tried to quit compared to 61.0% in the comparison group. Unadjusted quit rates were higher in the intervention group than in the comparison group at 3 months and 6 months but not at 12 months.

conclusionsDisadvantaged smokers were easily engaged to call the quitline, particularly when offered subsidised NRT. Disadvantaged smokers using the quitline, with and without subsidised NRT, achieved cessation outcomes comparable to other studies of "mainstream" smokers.

Indexed as

AdultCombined Modality TherapyCounselingDrug CostsFemaleHotlinesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotinePatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionSocioeconomic FactorsTobacco Use DisorderNicotine

Identifiers

PMID19131454
PMCPMC2655041
OpenAlexW2126744655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.