ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1991
Mechanisms controlling caffeine-induced relaxation of coronary artery of the pig.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhibition of muscarinic receptor-induced inositol phospholipid hydrolysis by caffeine, beta-adrenoceptors and protein kinase C in intestinal smooth muscle.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. We studied the effects of caffeine on coronary artery smooth muscle of the pig by measuring changes in isometric tension, cytosolic free Ca(2+) concentration ( [Ca2+]i) and transmembrane potential. 2. In the absence of tone, caffeine induced a concentration-dependent transient contraction of coronary artery strips, followed by sustained relaxation. Simultaneously with the relaxation, caffeine, 25 mM, hyperpolarized the smooth muscle cells by 7.7 +/- 0.9 mV. 3. Caffeine caused a concentration-dependent relaxation of strips precontracted with 10(-5)M acetylcholine (ACH). A supramaximal relaxing concentration of 25 mM caffeine produced an additional transient increase in [Ca2+]i on the Ca2+ plateau of ACh tonic contraction, which was followed by a decrease in [Ca2+]i to a level slightly below the basal concentration. This relaxation was accompanied by a hyperpolarization of 7.3 +/- 0.9 mV. 4. KCI 120 mM (high K+) contracted the strips with a concomitant depolarization of 38.6 +/- 1.6 mV and sustained increase in [Ca2+]i. Caffeine caused a concentration-dependent relaxation of high K+-induced contraction. Caffeine, 25 mM, decreased the Ca2+ plateau to a level that remained above the basal concentration of Ca2+ but did not change the membrane potential. 5. When strips were placed in a Ca(2+)-free medium with EGTA 2mM, and, in addition, ACh was applied successively three times, both intracellular and extracellular mobilizable Ca2+ pools were depleted. In these conditions, phorbol 12,13 dibutyrate (PDBu) 10(-7) M and prostaglandin F 2 alpha (PGF 2 alpha) 10(-5) M contracted the strips. Caffeine (25 mM) inhibited these contractions with no change in [Ca2+]i. 6. Forskolin, 3 x 10 -7M, inhibited ACh induced-contraction but did not affect those induced by PDBu. 7. In conclusion, these results show that caffeine has multiple cellular effects. During caffeine-induced relaxation, [Ca2" Ii, adenosine 3': 5'-cyclic monophosphate (cyclic AMP) content and membrane potential are modified. The findings suggest, however, that these effects are secondary, and that caffeine acts mainly by another unknown mechanism, possibly involving a direct inhibition of the contractile apparatus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.