Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19129440›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2009

Partial protection of Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected rhesus monkeys against superinfection with a heterologous SIV isolate.

Wendy W Yeh, Pimkwan Jaru-Ampornpan, Daiva Nevidomskyte, Mohammed Asmal, Srinivas S Rao, Adam P Buzby, David C Montefiori, Bette T Korber, Norman L Letvin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The evolutionary ecology of molecular replicators.Royal Society open science · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wendy W YehDivision of Viral Pathogenesis, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, CLS 1043, 3 Blackfan Circle, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Pimkwan Jaru-Ampornpan
Daiva Nevidomskyte
Mohammed Asmal
Srinivas S Rao
Adam P Buzby
David C Montefiori
Bette T Korber
Norman L Letvin

Funding

Viral Sequencing CoreU19AI067854 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LETVIN, NORMAN L · 2006 to 2011
$290.5M
Viral and Host Determinants of HIV-1 TransmissionU01AI067854 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYNES, BARTON F · 2005 to 2005
$14.9M
Multidisciplinary HIV Training ProgramT32AI007387 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Daniel R. Kuritzkes · 1990 to 2026
$8.8M
Viral Constraints on SIV Escape from Cytotoxic T LymphocytesK08AI069995 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI YEH, WENDY WEN-LI · 2006 to 2010
$585k
NIAID NIH HHS AI-067854NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI069995NIAID NIH HHS K08-AI069995NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007387NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI067854NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there is increasing evidence that individuals already infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) can be infected with a heterologous strain of the virus, the extent of protection against superinfection conferred by the first infection and the biologic consequences of superinfection are not well understood. We explored these questions in the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)/rhesus monkey model of HIV-1/AIDS. We infected cohorts of rhesus monkeys with either SIVmac251 or SIVsmE660 and then exposed animals to the reciprocal virus through intrarectal inoculations. Employing a quantitative real-time PCR assay, we determined the replication kinetics of the two strains of virus for 20 weeks. We found that primary infection with a replication-competent virus did not protect against acquisition of infection by a heterologous virus but did confer relative control of the superinfecting virus. In animals that became superinfected, there was a reduction in peak replication and rapid control of the second virus. The relative susceptibility to superinfection was not correlated with CD4(+) T-cell count, CD4(+) memory T-cell subsets, cytokine production by virus-specific CD8(+) or CD4(+) cells, or neutralizing antibodies at the time of exposure to the second virus. Although there were transient increases in viral loads of the primary virus and a modest decline in CD4(+) T-cell counts after superinfection, there was no evidence of disease acceleration. These findings indicate that an immunodeficiency virus infection confers partial protection against a second immunodeficiency virus infection, but this protection may be mediated by mechanisms other than classical adaptive immune responses.

Indexed as

Viral InterferenceAnimalsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCytokinesHIV AntibodiesImmunologic MemoryMacaca mulattaSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeSimian Immunodeficiency VirusViral LoadCytokinesHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID19129440
PMCPMC2648285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.