Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19129410›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009

Comparison of viral isolation and multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR for confirmation of respiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus detection by antigen immunoassays.

R S Liao, L L Tomalty, A Majury, D E Zoutman

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Using a novel rapid viral test to improve triage of emergency department patients with acute respiratory illness during flu season.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2018
    Observational
  12. Continuous Invasion by Respiratory Viruses Observed in Rural Households During a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Seasonal Outbreak in Coastal Kenya.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Surveillance of acute respiratory infections among outpatients: A pilot study in Isfahan city.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

R S LiaoDivision of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. robertliaocardinals@hotmail.com
L L Tomalty
A Majury
D E Zoutman
Queen's University · CABiology of Infection · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the Prodesse ProFlu-1 real-time reverse transcription-PCR multiplex assay with the SmartCycler instrument for the detection of human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza A and B viruses in comparison to conventional cell culture and antigen immunoassays with the BD Directigen A+B and Binax NOW RSV assays over two successive respiratory virus seasons. Ninety-two percent of the 361 specimens tested were nasopharyngeal aspirates obtained from individual patients, of which 119 were positive for RSV and 59 were positive for influenza virus. The median age of the patients whose specimens were positive for RSV and influenza virus were 6.3 months and 42.4 years, respectively. The specificity of all of the methods tested was >or=99%, and the individual sensitivities of NOW RSV, RSV culture, Directigen A+B, influenza virus culture, and the Proflu-1 PCR for influenza/RSV were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73 to 88), 57% (95% CI, 44 to 69), 59% (95% CI, 44 to 72), 54% (95% CI, 38 to 69), and 98% (95% CI, 93 to 100)/95% (95% CI, 85 to 99), respectively. In a clinical setting where viral isolation is performed to confirm rapid antigen immunoassay results for these common respiratory viruses, one-step real-time reverse transcriptase PCR testing can be a more sensitive and timely confirmatory method.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnimalsAntigens, ViralChild, PreschoolHumansImmunoassayInfantInfant, NewbornInfluenza A virusInfluenza B virusInfluenza, HumanMiddle AgedNasopharynxRespiratory Syncytial Virus, HumanRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsAntigens, Viral

Identifiers

PMID19129410
PMCPMC2650906
OpenAlexW2138938016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.