Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19129124›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2009

Cryptic preference for MHC-dissimilar females in male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Mark A F Gillingham, David S Richardson, Hanne Løvlie, Anna Moynihan, Kirsty Worley, Tom Pizzari

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Post-ejaculatory modifications to sperm (PEMS).Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Female mediation of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. MHC signaling during social communication.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark A F GillinghamDepartment of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK.
David S Richardson
Hanne Løvlie
Anna Moynihan
Kirsty Worley
Tom Pizzari
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of studies test the idea that females increase offspring fitness by biasing fertilization in favour of genetically compatible partners; however, few have investigated or controlled for corresponding preferences in males. Here, we experimentally test whether male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus, prefer genetically compatible females, measured by similarity at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), a key gene complex in vertebrate immune function. Theory predicts that because some degree of MHC heterozygosity favours viability, individuals should prefer partners that carry MHC alleles different from their own. While male fowl showed no preference when simultaneously presented with an MHC-similar and an MHC-dissimilar female, they showed a 'cryptic' preference, by allocating more sperm to the most MHC-dissimilar of two sequentially presented females. These results provide the first experimental evidence that males might respond to the MHC similarity of a female through differential ejaculate expenditure. By revealing that cryptic male behaviours may bias fertilization success in favour of genetically compatible partners, this study demonstrates the need to experimentally disentangle male and female effects when studying preferences for genetically compatible partners.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensFemaleMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMaleReproductionSexual Behavior, Animal

Identifiers

PMID19129124
PMCPMC2679071
OpenAlexW2017403736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.