Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19129054›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi2008

Mass screening of suspected febrile patients with remote-sensing infrared thermography: alarm temperature and optimal distance.

Ming-Fu Chiang, Po-Wei Lin, Li-Fong Lin, Hung-Yi Chiou, Ching-Wen Chien, Shu-Fen Chu, Wen-Ta Chiu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Overview of Thermal Infrared Imaging-Based Screenings during Pandemic Emergencies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Remote sensing of multiple vital signs using a CMOS camera-equipped infrared thermography system and its clinical application in rapidly screening patients with suspected infectious diseases.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Fever screening of seasonal influenza patients using a cost-effective thermopile array with small pixels for close-range thermometry.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ming-Fu ChiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Mackay Medicine, Management and Nursing College, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Po-Wei Lin
Li-Fong Lin
Hung-Yi Chiou
Ching-Wen Chien
Shu-Fen Chu
Wen-Ta Chiu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposeDetection of fever has become an essential step in identifying patients who may have severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) or avian influenza. This study evaluated infrared thermography (IRT) and compared the influence of different imagers, ambient temperature discrepancy, and the distance between the subject and imager.

methodsIRT-digital infrared thermal imaging (IRT-DITI), thermoguard, and ear drum IRT were used for visitors to Municipal Wang Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. The McNemar and Chi-squared test, standard Pearson correlation, ANOVA, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis were used to calculate the alarm temperature for each imager.

resultsA total of 1032 subjects were recruited. Different distances and ambient temperature discrepancy had a significant influence on thermoguard, and lateral and frontal view DITI. By ICC analysis, a significant difference was found at 10 m distance between ear drum IRT and thermoguard (r = 0.45), lateral view DITI (r = 0.37), and frontal view DITI (r = 0.44). With ROC analysis, the optimal preset cut-off temperatures for the different imagers were: 36.05 degrees C for thermoguard (area under the curve [AUC], 0.716), 36.25 degrees C for lateral view DITI (AUC, 0.801), and 36.25 degrees C for frontal view DITI (AUC, 0.812).

conclusionThe temperature readings obtained by IRT may be used as a proxy for core temperature. An effective IRT system with a strict operating protocol can be rapidly implemented at the entrance of a hospital during SARS or avian influenza epidemics.

Indexed as

Infrared RaysBody TemperatureDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease OutbreaksEquipment DesignFeverHumansInfluenza, HumanMass ScreeningROC CurveSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeTaiwanThermography

Identifiers

PMID19129054
PMCPMC7135452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.