Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19127952›Full record

ArticlePaediatric drugs2009

Delivering better medicines to children: need for better integration between the science, the policy, and the practice.

Madlen Gazarian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Madlen GazarianPaediatric Therapeutics Program, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales and Sydney Children's Hospital, New South Wales, Australia. M.Gazarian@unsw.edu.au

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are experiencing an exciting and unprecedented period in the history of children's medicines globally. Milestone developments unfolding in recent years include the formation of the International Alliance for Better Medicines for Children in 2006 and landmark initiatives by the EU, the World Health Assembly (WHA), and the WHO in 2007. However, the challenges of optimizing the development, wider availability, and routine use of effective, safe, and affordable medicines addressing important child health needs are considerable. Each aspect of this continuum has so far received differential attention. Major initiatives in the US and EU have focused on stimulating research into children's medicines, largely driven by drug regulatory reforms, but with important gaps remaining. Many countries are lacking similar reforms, so the benefits of these initiatives are currently not well reflected in the rest of the world. A systematic approach to knowledge translation to improve use of best evidence and deliver quality use of medicines (QUM) to children routinely has also been largely a 'missing link' so far. The WHO's Essential Medicines List for Children and related initiatives are addressing improving children's access to needed medicines. Priority research gaps, especially in the developing world, are also being pursued by the WHO. However, in many countries, including developed nations such as Australia, the policy response to the WHA resolution on 'Better Medicines for Children' has been inconsistent or fragmented. A better integrated overall approach, linking global medicines research efforts to child health needs and actual medicines use is needed. International networking to support the conduct, synthesis, and rapid dissemination of pediatric medicines research will help close knowledge gaps at a global level. Harmonization of pediatric drug regulation will support this goal and facilitate improving access to needed medicines. Increasing research into and dissemination of effective strategies to promote QUM is an essential component to maximize return (in health benefits) on increased investment in medicines research. A greater focus on QUM should also help create demand for better evidence from clinicians. Delivering on the promise of better medicines for children, wherever in the world they may be, depends on achieving successful integration between the science, the policy, and the practice of pediatric medicines.

Indexed as

AustraliaChildChild Health ServicesHealth PrioritiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInternational CooperationPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.