Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19126780›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2009

Quantitation of the contractile response mediated by two receptors: M2 and M3 muscarinic receptor-mediated contractions of human gastroesophageal smooth muscle.

Alan S Braverman, Larry S Miller, Anil K Vegesna, Mansoor I Tiwana, Ronald J Tallarida, Michael R Ruggieri

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Tissue engineering of the gastroesophageal junction.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Comparison of human and porcine gastric clasp and sling fiber contraction by M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2010
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan S BravermanDepartment of Urology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Larry S Miller
Anil K Vegesna
Mansoor I Tiwana
Ronald J Tallarida
Michael R Ruggieri
Temple University · US

Funding

Gastroesophageal Antireflux MechanismsR01DK079954 · NIDDK · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI MILLER, LARRY S, RUGGIERI, MICHAEL RAYMOND · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
THE HIGH PRESSURE ZONE OF THE DISTAL ESOPHAGUSR01DK059500 · NIDDK · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI MILLER, LARRY S · 2001 to 2006
$996k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK059500NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK059500NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although muscarinic receptors are known to mediate tonic contraction of human gastrointestinal tract smooth muscle, the receptor subtypes that mediate the tonic contractions are not entirely clear. Whole human stomachs with attached esophagus were procured from organ transplant donors. Cholinergic contractile responses of clasp, sling, lower esophageal circular (LEC), midesophageal circular (MEC), and midesophageal longitudinal (MEL) muscle strips were determined. Sling fibers contracted greater than the other fibers. Total, M(2) and M(3) muscarinic receptor density was determined for each of these dissections by immunoprecipitation. M(2) receptor density is greatest in the sling fibers, followed by clasp, LEC, MEC, and then MEL, whereas M(3) density is greatest in LEC, followed by MEL, MEC, sling, and then clasp. The potency of subtype-selective antagonists to inhibit bethanechol-induced contraction was calculated by Schild analysis to determine which muscarinic receptor subtypes contribute to contraction. The results suggest both M(2) and M(3) receptors mediate contraction in clasp and sling fibers. Thus, this type of analysis in which multiple receptors mediate the contractile response is inappropriate, and an analysis method relating dual occupation of M(2) and M(3) receptors to contraction is presented. Using this new method of analysis, it was found that the M(2) muscarinic receptor plays a greater role in mediating contraction of clasp and sling fibers than in LEC, MEC, and MEL muscles in which the M(3) receptor predominantly mediates contraction.

Indexed as

BethanecholDose-Response Relationship, DrugEsophagogastric JunctionEsophagusHumansImmunoprecipitationMuscarinic AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsMuscle ContractionMuscle, SmoothMyocytes, Smooth MuscleReceptor, Muscarinic M2Receptor, Muscarinic M3StomachBethanecholMuscarinic AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsReceptor, Muscarinic M2Receptor, Muscarinic M3

Identifiers

PMID19126780
PMCPMC2670594
OpenAlexW2136524666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.