Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19126207›Full record

ArticleJournal of immune based therapies and vaccines2009

Evaluation of recombinant invasive, non-pathogenic Eschericia coli as a vaccine vector against the intracellular pathogen, Brucella.

Jerome S Harms, Marina A Durward, Diogo M Magnani, Gary A Splitter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immune based therapies and vaccines, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Immunization withVaccines · 2021
    Article
  3. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jerome S HarmsDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1656 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA. harms@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu.
Marina A Durward
Diogo M Magnani
Gary A Splitter
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Vaccines and Therapies Against BotulismU54AI057153 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KANABROCKI, JOSEPH A. · 2003 to 2013
$87.6M
Brucella epitope recognition by CD8+ T cellsR01AI073558 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HARMS, JEROME SCOTT, SMITH, JUDITH ANNE · 2008 to 2016
$3.3M
TIR domain containing protein from Brucella melitensisR21AI088038 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HARMS, JEROME SCOTT · 2010 to 2011
$406k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073558NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI088038NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no safe, effective human vaccine against brucellosis. Live attenuated Brucella strains are widely used to vaccinate animals. However these live Brucella vaccines can cause disease and are unsafe for humans. Killed Brucella or subunit vaccines are not effective in eliciting long term protection. In this study, we evaluate an approach using a live, non-pathogenic bacteria (E. coli) genetically engineered to mimic the brucellae pathway of infection and present antigens for an appropriate cytolitic T cell response.

methodsE. coli was modified to express invasin of Yersinia and listerialysin O (LLO) of Listeria to impart the necessary infectivity and antigen releasing traits of the intracellular pathogen, Brucella. This modified E. coli was considered our vaccine delivery system and was engineered to express Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) or Brucella antigens for in vitro and in vivo immunological studies including cytokine profiling and cytotoxicity assays.

resultsThe E. coli vaccine vector was able to infect all cells tested and efficiently deliver therapeutics to the host cell. Using GFP as antigen, we demonstrate that the E. coli vaccine vector elicits a Th1 cytokine profile in both primary and secondary immune responses. Additionally, using this vector to deliver a Brucella antigen, we demonstrate the ability of the E. coli vaccine vector to induce specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTLs).

conclusionProtection against most intracellular bacterial pathogens can be obtained mostly through cell mediated immunity. Data presented here suggest modified E. coli can be used as a vaccine vector for delivery of antigens and therapeutics mimicking the infection of the pathogen and inducing cell mediated immunity to that pathogen.

Identifiers

PMID19126207
PMCPMC2633335
OpenAlexW2011491975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.