Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19125639›Full record

ReviewOligonucleotides2009

Therapeutic potential of splice-switching oligonucleotides.

John Bauman, Natee Jearawiriyapaisarn, Ryszard Kole

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oligonucleotides, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alternative splicing and cancer: a systematic review.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Targeting RNA structures with small molecules.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2022
    Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John BaumanDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Natee Jearawiriyapaisarn
Ryszard Kole
Mahidol University · THUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

TRANSPORT AND DELIVERY OF ANTISNESE OLIGONUCLEOTIDESP01GM059299 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JULIANO, RUDOLPH · 2000 to 2010
$11.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM059299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative splicing enables a single pre-messenger RNA transcript to yield multiple protein isoforms, making it a major contributor to the diversity of the proteome. While this process is essential for normal development, aberrations in alternative splicing are the cause of a multitude of human diseases. Methods for manipulating alternative splicing would thus be of therapeutic value. Chemically modified antisense oligonucleotides that alter alternative splicing by directing splice site selection have been developed to achieve this end. These splice-switching oligonucleotides (SSOs) have been applied to correct aberrant splicing, induce expression of a therapeutic splice variant, or induce expression of a novel therapeutic splice variant in a number of disease-relevant genes. Recently, in vivo efficacy of SSOs has been reported using animal disease models, as well as in results from the first clinical trial.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingHumansMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneOligonucleotidesRNA, MessengerOligonucleotidesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID19125639
PMCPMC2663420
OpenAlexW2076348849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.