Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19125622›Full record

ReviewJournal of natural products2009

Tubulin-interactive natural products as anticancer agents.

David G I Kingston

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of natural products, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 86 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Special Issue "Anticancer Drug Discovery Based on Natural Products".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David G I KingstonDepartment of Chemistry, M/C 0212, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0212, USA. dkingston@vt.edu

Funding

STUDIES OF TUBULIN-INTERACTIVE ANTICANCER DRUGSR01CA069571 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI KINGSTON, DAVID GEORGE IAN · 1996 to 2008
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA069571NCI NIH HHS R01 CA69571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides an overview of the discovery, structures, and biological activities of anticancer natural products that act by inhibiting or promoting the assembly of tubulin to microtubules. The emphasis is on providing recent information on those compounds in clinical use or in advanced clinical trials. The vinca alkaloids, the combretastatins, NPI-2358, the halichondrin B analogue eribulin, dolastatin 10, noscapine, hemiasterlin, and rhizoxin are discussed as tubulin polymerization inhibitors, while the taxanes and the epothilones are the major classes of tubulin polymerization promoters presented, with brief treatments of discodermolide, eleutherobin, and laulimalide. The challenges and future directions of tubulin-interactive natural products-based drug discovery programs are also discussed briefly.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsTubulinDiketopiperazinesImidazolesMicrotubulesMolecular StructurePiperazinesVinca AlkaloidsAntineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsDiketopiperazinesImidazolesNPI 2358PiperazinesTubulinVinca Alkaloids

Identifiers

PMID19125622
PMCPMC2765517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.