Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19125335›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2009

Perceived threat, risk perception, and efficacy beliefs related to SARS and other (emerging) infectious diseases: results of an international survey.

Onno de Zwart, Irene K Veldhuijzen, Gillian Elam, Arja R Aro, Thomas Abraham, George D Bishop, Hélène A C M Voeten, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Johannes Brug

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of the Impacts of Coronavirus on Society and Culture.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. How Information-Seeking Reduces Cancer Fatalism: A Comparison of the Mediating Role of Risk Perception in Young and Older Adults.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. University Experience during the First Two Waves of COVID-19: Students' Experiences and Psychological Wellbeing.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Onno de ZwartDivision of Infectious Diseases Control, Municipal Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, PO Box 70032, 3000 LP Rotterdam, The Netherlands. dezwarto@ggd.rotterdam.nl
Irene K Veldhuijzen
Gillian Elam
Arja R Aro
Thomas Abraham
George D Bishop
Hélène A C M Voeten
Jan Hendrik Richardus
Johannes Brug

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study the levels of perceived threat, perceived severity, perceived vulnerability, response efficacy, and self-efficacy for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and eight other diseases in five European and three Asian countries.

methodA computer-assisted phone survey was conducted among 3,436 respondents. The questionnaire focused on perceived threat, vulnerability, severity, response efficacy, and self-efficacy related to SARS and eight other diseases.

resultsPerceived threat of SARS in case of an outbreak in the country was higher than that of other diseases. Perceived vulnerability of SARS was at an intermediate level and perceived severity was high compared to other diseases. Perceived threat for SARS varied between countries in Europe and Asia with a higher perceived severity of SARS in Europe and a higher perceived vulnerability in Asia. Response efficacy and self-efficacy for SARS were higher in Asia compared to Europe. In multiple linear regression analyses, country was strongly associated with perceived threat.

conclusionsThe relatively high perceived threat for SARS indicates that it is seen as a public health risk and offers a basis for communication in case of an outbreak. The strong association between perceived threat and country and different regional patterns require further research.

Indexed as

CultureHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRisk AssessmentAdolescentAdultAgedAsiaCross-Cultural ComparisonDisease OutbreaksEuropeHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedRisk-TakingSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID19125335
PMCPMC2691522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.