Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19124497›Full record

SynthesisCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2009

Cruciferous vegetable consumption and lung cancer risk: a systematic review.

Tram Kim Lam, Lisa Gallicchio, Kristina Lindsley, Meredith Shiels, Edward Hammond, Xuguang Grant Tao, Liwei Chen, Karen A Robinson, Laura E Caulfield, James G Herman and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 219 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cruciferous vegetables consumption and the risk of female lung cancer: a prospective study and a meta-analysis.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The global diet quality score (GDQS) of foods consumed by Nigerian adults.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Overview of Phytochemical Composition ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Secular-Trend Analysis of the Incidence Rate of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Tram Kim LamCancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Office of Preventive Oncology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Lisa Gallicchio
Kristina Lindsley
Meredith Shiels
Edward Hammond
Xuguang Grant Tao
Liwei Chen
Karen A Robinson
Laura E Caulfield
James G Herman
Eliseo Guallar
Anthony J Alberg
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USMaineGeneral Medical Center · USMedical University of South Carolina · USMercy Medical Center · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCruciferous vegetables, rich in isothiocyanates, may protect against lung cancer. Glutathione S-transferases are important in metabolizing isothiocyanates; hence, variants in GST genes may modify the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and lung cancer. We carried out a systematic review to characterize the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and lung cancer risk, with an emphasis on the potential interaction between cruciferous vegetables and GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene variants.

methodsA search of the epidemiologic literature through December 2007 was conducted using 15 bibliographic databases without language restrictions. Thirty studies on the association between lung cancer and either total cruciferous vegetable consumption (6 cohort and 12 case-control studies) or specific cruciferous vegetables (1 cohort and 11 case-control studies) were included.

resultsThe risk for lung cancer among those in the highest category of total cruciferous vegetable intake was 22% lower in case-control studies [random-effects pooled odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.70-0.88] and 17% lower in cohort studies (pooled relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.62-1.08) compared with those in the lowest category of intake. The strongest inverse association of total cruciferous vegetable intake with lung cancer risk was seen among individuals with GSTM1 and GSTT1 double null genotypes (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26-0.65; P for interaction = 0.01).

conclusionsEpidemiologic evidence suggests that cruciferous vegetable intake may be weakly and inversely associated with lung cancer risk. Because of a gene-diet interaction, the strongest inverse association was among those with homozygous deletion for GSTM1 and GSTT1.

Indexed as

BrassicaceaeDietVegetablesGenotypeGlutathione TransferaseHumansLung NeoplasmsRiskGlutathione Transferase

Identifiers

PMID19124497
PMCPMC2735794
OpenAlexW2103985935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.