ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2008
Is day-case cataract surgery an attractive alternative from the patients' point of view? A questionnaire survey.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determinants of inappropriate hospitalization in cataract surgery in the south of Italy: a retrospective study.International ophthalmology · 2019Article
- The switch between cataract surgical settings: Evidence from a time series analysis across 20 EU countries.PloS one · 2018Article
- More frequent requests for day-case cataract surgery : An impressive mind switch in the Austrian population within 7 years.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2017Article
- An instrument assessing patient satisfaction with day care in hospitals.BMC health services research · 2012Article
- A management dilemma: infectious keratitis associated with soft contact lens use and dubious treatment compliance.Case reports in medicine · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cataract surgery is the most common elective surgical procedure undertaken in elderly people. In many European countries and in the USA cataract surgery is normally a day-case procedure without an overnight stay in hospital, unlike the situation in Austria where fewer than 2% of patients are day cases. However, there is a lack of prospective studies on patients' need for and acceptance of day-case surgery. The aim of our study was therefore to evaluate patients' demand and suitability for outpatient surgery, based on analysis of preoperative questionnaires on availability of family and/or social support and on preoperative ophthalmologic examination. Among 500 consecutive patients with cataract, 154 (41.8%) chose a day-case procedure and 256 (58.2%) preferred inpatient admission. Patients preferring full admission were older (mean age 76.4+/-8.1 vs. 72.73+/-9.5 years, P<0.001), had worse visual acuity (0.55+/-0.20 vs. 0.66+/-0.23, P<0.001), were more likely to be female (63.9% vs. 47.0%, P=0.001), to live more than one hour away from the hospital (26.5% vs. 12.5%, P<0.001) and have no carer at home (43.0% vs. 6.5%, P<0.001). Patients favoring day-case surgery were more likely to be able to attend an ophthalmologic check-up 24 h after surgery (96.7% vs. 59.6%, p<0.001). The majority of patients indicated a preference for inpatient care, but this may be a reflection of their previous hospital experience and a matter of custom in the elderly population. Information, education and better organization of after-surgery services could help increase the attractiveness of cataract surgery as an outpatient procedure in Austria. Our findings could also be relevant to day-case services in medical care in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.