Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19122668›Full record

ArticleNature methods2009

Microfluidic control of cell pairing and fusion.

Alison M Skelley, Oktay Kirak, Heikyung Suh, Rudolf Jaenisch, Joel Voldman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Single Cell-Pair Proteomics for Decoding Immune-Cancer Cell Interactions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  17. Mapping Nanoscale-To-Single-Cell Phosphoproteomic Landscape by Chip-DIA.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alison M SkelleyResearch Laboratory of Electronics, 50 Vassar Street, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Oktay Kirak
Heikyung Suh
Rudolf Jaenisch
Joel Voldman

Funding

GENOMIC IMPRINTING AND THE CLONING OF MICER37CA084198 · NCI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI JAENISCH, RUDOLF · 2000 to 2008
$9.2M
Epigenetics, Stem Cells, and CancerR01CA087869 · NCI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI JAENISCH, RUDOLF · 2001 to 2010
$8.2M
Microscale control of stem cell signaling using cell patterning and perfusionR01EB007278 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI VOLDMAN, JOEL · 2007 to 2010
$1.3M
Microfluidic-based high-efficiency cell fusion for studying nuclear reprogrammingR21EB008550 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI VOLDMAN, JOEL · 2008 to 2009
$416k
NCI NIH HHS 5-R37CA084198NCI NIH HHS R01 CA087869NCI NIH HHS R37 CA084198NIBIB NIH HHS EB007278NIBIB NIH HHS EB008550NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007278NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB008550PHS HHS 5-R01-HDO45022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell fusion has been used for many different purposes, including generation of hybridomas and reprogramming of somatic cells. The fusion step is the key event in initiation of these procedures. Standard fusion techniques, however, provide poor and random cell contact, leading to low yields. We present here a microfluidic device to trap and properly pair thousands of cells. Using this device, we paired different cell types, including fibroblasts, mouse embryonic stem cells and myeloma cells, achieving pairing efficiencies up to 70%. The device is compatible with both chemical and electrical fusion protocols. We observed that electrical fusion was more efficient than chemical fusion, with membrane reorganization efficiencies of up to 89%. We achieved greater than 50% properly paired and fused cells over the entire device, fivefold greater than with a commercial electrofusion chamber and observed reprogramming in hybrids between mouse embryonic stem cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell FusionCell Line, TumorElectroporationEmbryonic Stem CellsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesNIH 3T3 CellsPolyethylene GlycolsPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID19122668
PMCPMC3251011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.