Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19121219›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2009

Analysis of the platypus genome suggests a transposon origin for mammalian imprinting.

Andrew J Pask, Anthony T Papenfuss, Eleanor I Ager, Kaighin A McColl, Terence P Speed, Marilyn B Renfree

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DNA methylation dynamics in the germline of the marsupial tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Physiology of the read-write genome.The Journal of physiology · 2014
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The origin and evolution of genomic imprinting and viviparity in mammals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew J PaskDepartment of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. andrew.pask@uconn.edu
Anthony T Papenfuss
Eleanor I Ager
Kaighin A McColl
Terence P Speed
Marilyn B Renfree

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon that results in monoallelic gene expression. Many hypotheses have been advanced to explain why genomic imprinting evolved in mammals, but few have examined how it arose. The host defence hypothesis suggests that imprinting evolved from existing mechanisms within the cell that act to silence foreign DNA elements that insert into the genome. However, the changes to the mammalian genome that accompanied the evolution of imprinting have been hard to define due to the absence of large scale genomic resources between all extant classes. The recent release of the platypus genome has provided the first opportunity to perform comparisons between prototherian (monotreme; which appear to lack imprinting) and therian (marsupial and eutherian; which have imprinting) mammals.

resultsWe compared the distribution of repeat elements known to attract epigenetic silencing across the entire genome from monotremes and therian mammals, particularly focusing on the orthologous imprinted regions. There is a significant accumulation of certain repeat elements within imprinted regions of therian mammals compared to the platypus.

conclusionsOur analyses show that the platypus has significantly fewer repeats of certain classes in the regions of the genome that have become imprinted in therian mammals. The accumulation of repeats, especially long terminal repeats and DNA elements, in therian imprinted genes and gene clusters is coincident with, and may have been a potential driving force in, the development of mammalian genomic imprinting. These data provide strong support for the host defence hypothesis.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsGene SilencingGenomeGenomic ImprintingMammalsMarsupialiaMonotremataPlatypusRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidTerminal Repeat SequencesDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID19121219
PMCPMC2687786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.