ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2008
Early antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Olmesartan/Amlodipine Single-Pill Combination on 24-h Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Monitoring in Non-Responders to Valsartan or Candesartan Monotherapy.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Trial
- Effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist olmesartan on morning home blood pressure in hypertension: HONEST study at 16 weeks.Journal of human hypertension · 2013Observational
- Rationale, study design, baseline characteristics and blood pressure at 16 weeks in the HONEST Study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The authors assessed the early antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) in a 12-week prospective observational study. Of 2221 patients with untreated hypertension who received OM (mainly 10 or 20 mg), 331 patients whose blood pressure (BP) was measured at 1 week after initiation of treatment were defined as the "early BP determination group,'' whereas the remaining 1890 patients were defined as the ;;standard BP determination group.'' Baseline characteristics, doses of OM, concomitant drugs used, and BP during treatment did not differ between the 2 groups. The achievement rate of BP target (<140/90 mm Hg) was 28.4% at 1 week in the early BP determination group and 28.3% at 2 weeks in the standard BP determination group (P=NS). Rates of adverse drug reactions in the 2 groups were similar. The present study suggests that OM is safe and effective in reducing BP at an early time point of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.