Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19120373›Full record

ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2010

Ependymoblastoma: dear, damned, distracting diagnosis, farewell!*.

Alexander R Judkins, David W Ellison

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A brief history of ependymoma.Neuro-oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Sacrococcygeal ependymoblastoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil and true rosettes: an autopsy case-based update and review of the literature.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2013
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander R JudkinsDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David W Ellison
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ependymoblastoma is a diagnostic label that has been applied to a variety of rare central nervous system (CNS) tumors over the last eight decades. Consequently, there is uncertainty about whether such an entity exists and what its characteristic features might be. The current study, based on 14 cases from our institutional archives and identified by the search terms "ependymoblastoma,"ependymoblastomatous," "ependymoblastic" or "PNET with ependymal differentiation," aimed to test the hypothesis that the ependymoblastoma is a distinct and recognizable entity. Ependymoblastic rosettes are a key diagnostic feature and were present in 11/14 (79%) tumors, eight (73%) of which were embryonal tumors with abundant areas of neuropil-like differentiation. Three other cases showed rare ependymoblastic rosettes in the histopathological setting of a typical primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), medulloblastoma (MB) or atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT). The remaining cases were all embryonal tumors with structures that mimicked ependymoblastic rosettes. Our results indicate that ependymoblastic rosettes are most frequently encountered in embryonal tumors with abundant neuropil and less frequently in other CNS embryonal neoplasms, including PNET, MB and AT/RT. We believe that ependymoblastoma as a diagnosis is neither precise nor specific and that it is time once and for all to retire this diagnosis from the lexicon of neuropathology.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGangliaHumansImmunohistochemistryInfantMaleMedulloblastomaNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNeuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitiveNeuronsNeuropilRhabdoid Tumor

Identifiers

PMID19120373
PMCPMC8094718
OpenAlexW1539008955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.