Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19120266›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2008

Humanized mice for the study of type 1 diabetes and beta cell function.

Marie King, Todd Pearson, Aldo A Rossini, Leonard D Shultz, Dale L Greiner

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Use of a Humanized NSG-β2mFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Humanized Mouse Models for Transplant Immunology.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2016
    Review
  14. Application of Humanized Mice in Immunological Research.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The use of animal models in diabetes research.British journal of pharmacology · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marie KingDepartment of Medicine, Division of Diabetes, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Todd Pearson
Aldo A Rossini
Leonard D Shultz
Dale L Greiner
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USJackson Laboratory · US

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Virology and Technology CoreP01AI046629 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI GREINER, DALE LESLIE · 1999 to 2014
$19.1M
PILOT AND FEASIBILITY PROGRAMP30DK032520 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CZECH, MICHAEL P · 1986 to 2010
$14.6M
ROLE OF CBL AND PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-KINASE IN CD40 SIGNALINGP01DK053006 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MORDES, JOHN PETER · 1997 to 2007
$8.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA34196NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NIAID NIH HHS AI46629NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI046629NIDDK NIH HHS DK32520NIDDK NIH HHS DK53006NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK053006NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK032520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the basic biology of diabetes has been guided by observations made using animal models, particularly rodents. However, humans are not mice, and outcomes predicted by murine studies are not always representative of actual outcomes in the clinic. In particular, investigators studying diabetes have relied heavily on mouse and rat models of autoimmune type 1-like diabetes, and experimental results using these models have not been representative of many of the clinical trials in type 1 diabetes. In this article, we describe the availability of new models of humanized mice for the study of three areas of diabetes. These include the use of humanized mice for the study of (1) human islet stem and progenitor cells, (2) human islet allograft rejection, and (3) human immunity and autoimmunity. These humanized mouse models provide an important preclinical bridge between in vitro studies and rodent models and the translation of discoveries in these model systems to the clinic.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMiceAnimalsAutoimmunityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansImmune SystemInsulin-Secreting CellsMice, SCIDStem CellsTransplantation, Heterologous

Identifiers

PMID19120266
PMCPMC2620029
OpenAlexW1990089552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.