ArticleInternational journal of biological sciences2009
Using profiles based on nucleotide hydrophobicity to define essential regions for splicing.
Article in International journal of biological sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The importance of hydrophobic interactions in the structure of transcription systems.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2021Article
- Pan-cancer analysis of systematic batch effects on somatic sequence variations.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The splice-site sequences of U2-type introns are highly degenerate, so many different sequences can function as U2-type splice sites. Using our new profiles based on hydrophobicity properties we pointed out specific properties for regions surrounding splice sites. We built a set T of flanking regions of genes with 1-3 introns from 21st and 22nd chromosomes extracted from GenBank to define positions having conserved properties, namely hydrophobicity, that are potentially essential for recognition by spliceosome. GT-AG introns exist in U2 and U12-types. Therefore, intron type cannot be simply determined by the dinucleotide termini. We attempted to distinguish U2 and U12-types introns with help of hydrophobicity profiles on sets of spice sites for U2 or U12-type introns extracted from SpliceRack database. The positions given by our method, which may be important for recognition by spliceosome, were compared to the nucleotide consensus provided by a classical method, Pictogram. We showed that there is a similarity of hydrophobicity profiles inside intron types. On one hand, GT-AG and GC-AG introns belonging to U2-type have resembling hydrophobicity profiles as well as AT-AC and GT-AG introns belonging to U12-type. On the other hand, hydrophobicity profiles of U2 and U12-types GT-AG introns are completely different. We suggest that hydrophobicity profiles facilitate definition of intron type, distinguishing U2 and U12 intron types and can be used to build programs to search splice site and to evaluate their strength. Therefore, our study proves that hydrophobicity profiles are informative method providing insights into mechanisms of splice sites recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.