Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19118679›Full record

ReviewMethods in cell biology2008

Chapter 10: Infrared and Raman microscopy in cell biology.

Christian Matthäus, Benjamin Bird, Milos Miljković, Tatyana Chernenko, Melissa Romeo, Max Diem

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in cell biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Quick Detection ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian MatthäusDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Benjamin Bird
Milos Miljković
Tatyana Chernenko
Melissa Romeo
Max Diem

Funding

Micro-Spectroscopy for Cytological Screening, and Staging of DiseaseR01CA090346 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI DIEM, MAX · 2003 to 2010
$3.2M
DETECTION OF CANCEROUS CELLS VIA FT IR MICROSCOPYR21CA081675 · NCI · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI DIEM, MAX · 2000 to 2001
$225k
NCI NIH HHS CA 090346NCI NIH HHS CA 81675NCI NIH HHS R01 CA090346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This chapter presents novel microscopic methods to monitor cell biological processes of live or fixed cells without the use of any dye, stains, or other contrast agent. These methods are based on spectral techniques that detect inherent spectroscopic properties of biochemical constituents of cells, or parts thereof. Two different modalities have been developed for this task. One of them is infrared micro-spectroscopy, in which an average snapshot of a cell's biochemical composition is collected at a spatial resolution of typically 25 mum. This technique, which is extremely sensitive and can collect such a snapshot in fractions of a second, is particularly suited for studying gross biochemical changes. The other technique, Raman microscopy (also known as Raman micro-spectroscopy), is ideally suited to study variations of cellular composition on the scale of subcellular organelles, since its spatial resolution is as good as that of fluorescence microscopy. Both techniques exhibit the fingerprint sensitivity of vibrational spectroscopy toward biochemical composition, and can be used to follow a variety of cellular processes.

Indexed as

CellsHeLa CellsHumansMicroscopySpectrophotometry, InfraredSpectrum Analysis, Raman

Identifiers

PMID19118679
PMCPMC2830543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.