Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19117354›Full record

SynthesisCancer2009

Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node positivity in thin melanoma (<or=1 mm).

Melanie A Warycha, Jan Zakrzewski, Quanhong Ni, Richard L Shapiro, Russell S Berman, Anna C Pavlick, David Polsky, Madhu Mazumdar, Iman Osman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Re-evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Sentinel lymph node imaging in urologic oncology.Translational andrology and urology · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous head and neck melanoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie A WarychaDepartment of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
Jan Zakrzewski
Quanhong Ni
Richard L Shapiro
Russell S Berman
Anna C Pavlick
David Polsky
Madhu Mazumdar
Iman Osman
New York University · USCornell University · US

Funding

Vaccine FacilityP30CA016087 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Drew R Jones · 1985 to 2026
$83.1M
NCI NIH HHS 5 P30 CA 016087-27NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the lack of an established survival benefit of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, this technique has been increasingly applied in the staging of thin (<or=1 mm) melanoma patients, without clear evidence to support this recommendation. The authors performed a meta-analysis to estimate the risk, potential predictors, and outcome of SLN positivity in this group of patients.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for rates of SLN positivity in patients with thin melanoma. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q statistic, and publication bias was examined through funnel plot and the Begg and Mazumdar method. Overall SLN positivity in thin melanoma patients was estimated using the DerSimonial-Laird random effect method.

resultsThirty-four studies comprising 3651 patients met inclusion criteria. The pooled SLN positivity rate was 5.6%. Significant heterogeneity among studies was detected (P = .005). There was no statistical evidence of publication bias (P = .21). Eighteen studies reported select clinical and histopathologic data limited to SLN-positive patients (n = 113). Among the tumors from these patients, 6.1% were ulcerated, 31.5% demonstrated regression, and 47.5% were Clark level IV/V. Only 4 melanoma-related deaths were reported.

conclusionsRelatively few patients with thin melanoma have a positive SLN. To the authors' knowledge, there are no clinical or histopathologic criteria that can reliably identify thin melanoma patients who might benefit from this intervention. Given the increasing diagnosis of thin melanoma, in addition to the cost and potential morbidity of this procedure, alternative strategies to identify patients at risk for lymph node disease are needed.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMitosisPeriodicals as TopicSkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID19117354
PMCPMC3888103
OpenAlexW2109129829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.