Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19116359›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009

Cross-priming amplification for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens.

Rendong Fang, Xia Li, Lin Hu, Qimin You, Jing Li, Jie Wu, Peng Xu, Huayan Zhong, Ying Luo, Jian Mei and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [Clinical value of automated EasyNAT system for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in paraffin-embedded tissues].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rapid detection ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rendong FangDepartment of TB Control, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200336, China.
Xia Li
Lin Hu
Qimin You
Jing Li
Jie Wu
Peng Xu
Huayan Zhong
Ying Luo
Jian Mei
Qian Gao

Funding

UC Davis-China Infectious Disease Research TrainingD43TW007887 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DERIEMER, KATHRYN L · 2008 to 2012
$743k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW007887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-priming amplification (CPA) technology for tuberculosis diagnosis from sputum specimens was evaluated. The sensitivity of CPA from smear- and liquid culture-positive specimens was 96.9%, and that from smear-negative and liquid culture-positive specimens was 87.5%. The specificity of CPA in culture-negative specimens was 98.8%.

Indexed as

Base SequenceDNA PrimersHumansMolecular Sequence DataMycobacterium tuberculosisNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificitySputumTuberculosisDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID19116359
PMCPMC2650920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.