Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19116347›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009

Utility of peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization for rapid detection of Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

A Y Peleg, Y Tilahun, M J Fiandaca, E M C D'Agata, L Venkataraman, R C Moellering, G M Eliopoulos

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Utility of aptamer-fluorescence in situ hybridization for rapid detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A Y PelegBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. apeleg@bidmc.harvard.edu
Y Tilahun
M J Fiandaca
E M C D'Agata
L Venkataraman
R C Moellering
G M Eliopoulos
Harvard University · USHadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utility of peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA FISH) for the detection of Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was evaluated on broth suspensions and spiked blood cultures of ATCC strains and clinical isolates with select gram-negative rods. After testing 60 clinical isolates, PNA FISH had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 100%, respectively, for Acinetobacter spp. and 100% and 95%, respectively, for P. aeruginosa. PNA FISH was able to detect both pathogens simultaneously and directly from spiked blood cultures.

Indexed as

Peptide Nucleic AcidsAcinetobacterAcinetobacter InfectionsHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificityPeptide Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID19116347
PMCPMC2650942
OpenAlexW2145779047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.