Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19116303›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2009

Prediction of merozoite surface protein 1 and apical membrane antigen 1 vaccine efficacies against Plasmodium chabaudi malaria based on prechallenge antibody responses.

Michelle M Lynch, Amy Cernetich-Ott, William P Weidanz, James M Burns

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inclusion of an OptimizedJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Immunosignatures can predict vaccine efficacy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle M LynchCenter for Molecular Parasitology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19129, USA.
Amy Cernetich-Ott
William P Weidanz
James M Burns
Drexel University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF NONSTERILIZING IMMUNITY IN MALARIAR01AI012710 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WEIDANZ, WILLIAM PAUL · 1985 to 2008
$2.3M
Immunization-induced AMI and CMI against malariaR01AI049585 · NIAID · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI BURNS, JAMES MATTHEW · 2002 to 2005
$1.2M
IMMUNIZATION INDUCED AMI AND CMI AGAINIST MALARIAR21AI049585 · NIAID · MCP HAHNEMANN UNIVERSITY · PI BURNS, JAMES MATTHEW · 2000 to 2000
$341k
NIAID NIH HHS AI12710NIAID NIH HHS AI49585NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI012710NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049585NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI049585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the development of blood-stage malaria vaccines, there is a clear need to establish in vitro measures of the antibody-mediated and the cell-mediated immune responses that correlate with protection. In this study, we focused on establishing correlates of antibody-mediated immunity induced by immunization with apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) and merozoite surface protein 1(42) (MSP1(42)) subunit vaccines. To do so, we exploited the Plasmodium chabaudi rodent model, with which we can immunize animals with both protective and nonprotective vaccine formulations and allow the parasitemia in the challenged animals to peak. Vaccine formulations were varied with regard to the antigen dose, the antigen conformation, and the adjuvant used. Prechallenge antibody responses were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and were tested for a correlation with protection against nonlethal P. chabaudi malaria, as measured by a reduction in the peak level of parasitemia. The analysis showed that neither the isotype profile nor the avidity of vaccine-induced antibodies correlated with protective efficacy. However, high titers of antibodies directed against conformation-independent epitopes were associated with poor vaccine performance and may limit the effectiveness of protective antibodies that recognize conformation-dependent epitopes. We were able to predict the efficacies of the P. chabaudi AMA1 (PcAMA1) and P. chabaudi MSP1(42) (PcMSP1(42)) vaccines only when the prechallenge antibody titers to both refolded and reduced/alkylated antigens were considered in combination. The relative importance of these two measures of vaccine-induced responses as predictors of protection differed somewhat for the PcAMA1 and the PcMSP1(42) vaccines, a finding confirmed in our final immunization and challenge study. A similar approach to the evaluation of vaccine-induced antibody responses may be useful during clinical trials of Plasmodium falciparum AMA1 and MSP1(42) vaccines.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanBiomarkersEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEpitopes, B-LymphocyteMalariaMalaria VaccinesMaleMembrane ProteinsMerozoite Surface Protein 1MiceMice, Inbred C57BLParasitemiaPlasmodium chabaudiAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, Protozoanapical membrane antigen I, PlasmodiumBiomarkersEpitopes, B-LymphocyteMalaria VaccinesMembrane ProteinsMerozoite Surface Protein 1Protozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19116303
PMCPMC2650862
OpenAlexW2121301537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.