ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009
A reappraisal of evidence for probabilistic models of allelic exclusion.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The proximal J kappa germline-transcript promoter facilitates receptor editing through control of ordered recombination.PloS one · 2015Article
- Mechanisms and consequences of widespread random monoallelic expression.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2012Review
- Antigen receptor allelic exclusion: an update and reappraisal.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2010Review
- Allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin genes: models and mechanisms.Immunological reviews · 2010Review
- Epigenetic regulation of antigen receptor gene rearrangement.F1000 biology reports · 2010Article
- TCR beta feedback signals inhibit the coupling of recombinationally accessible V beta 14 segments with DJ beta complexes.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
B cell development requires the coordinated rearrangement of Ig heavy (IgH) and light chain loci (IgL). Most mature B cells express a single B cell receptor of unique specificity, and a central question in immunology concerns the mechanisms that prevent the productive rearrangement of >1 IgH and IgL allele per cell. Probabilistic models of allelic exclusion maintain that simultaneous rearrangement of both alleles is rare, because the likelihood of undergoing rearrangement is low for a given Ig allele. Strong support for this idea came from studies in which a GFP marker was inserted into the Igk locus. In this system, the probability of high-level germ-line transcription and subsequent locus rearrangement appeared to be low in pre-B cells. Readdressing the validity of GFP expression as a reporter for the level of germ-line transcription, we found a striking discordance between GFP transcript and protein levels at the pre-B cell stage, which is explained at least in part by the developmentally regulated usage of 2 alternative Igk-J germ-line promoters. These results question the validity of the kappa-GFP system as evidence for probabilistic models of allelic exclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.