Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19112483›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2008

Search algorithms as a framework for the optimization of drug combinations.

Diego Calzolari, Stefania Bruschi, Laurence Coquin, Jennifer Schofield, Jacob D Feala, John C Reed, Andrew D McCulloch, Giovanni Paternostro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in artificial intelligence-based technologies for increasing the quality of medical products.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prediction of multidimensional drug dose responses based on measurements of drug pairs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Diego CalzolariBurnham Institute for Medical Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Stefania Bruschi
Laurence Coquin
Jennifer Schofield
Jacob D Feala
John C Reed
Andrew D McCulloch
Giovanni Paternostro

Funding

Small Molecule Antagonists of IAPs Based on Mimicking SMACU19CA113318 · NCI · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI CARSON, DENNIS · 2005 to 2009
$5.7M
Systems Biology of Cardiac AgingR21AG026729 · NIA · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI PATERNOSTRO, GIOVANNI · 2005 to 2006
$340k
NCI NIH HHS CA113318NCI NIH HHS U19 CA113318NIA NIH HHS AG026729NIA NIH HHS R21 AG026729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combination therapies are often needed for effective clinical outcomes in the management of complex diseases, but presently they are generally based on empirical clinical experience. Here we suggest a novel application of search algorithms -- originally developed for digital communication -- modified to optimize combinations of therapeutic interventions. In biological experiments measuring the restoration of the decline with age in heart function and exercise capacity in Drosophila melanogaster, we found that search algorithms correctly identified optimal combinations of four drugs using only one-third of the tests performed in a fully factorial search. In experiments identifying combinations of three doses of up to six drugs for selective killing of human cancer cells, search algorithms resulted in a highly significant enrichment of selective combinations compared with random searches. In simulations using a network model of cell death, we found that the search algorithms identified the optimal combinations of 6-9 interventions in 80-90% of tests, compared with 15-30% for an equivalent random search. These findings suggest that modified search algorithms from information theory have the potential to enhance the discovery of novel therapeutic drug combinations. This report also helps to frame a biomedical problem that will benefit from an interdisciplinary effort and suggests a general strategy for its solution.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDecision Support TechniquesDrug Therapy, CombinationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, Computer-AssistedPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID19112483
PMCPMC2590660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.