Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19108729›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2008

A first generation whole genome RH map of the river buffalo with comparison to domestic cattle.

M Elisabete J Amaral, Jason R Grant, Penny K Riggs, Nedenia B Stafuzza, Edson A Rodrigues Filho, Tom Goldammer, Rosemarie Weikard, Ronald M Brunner, Kelli J Kochan, Anthony J Greco and 24 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Cytogenetics in Domestic Bovids: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Cytogenetics of the Water Buffalo: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

M Elisabete J AmaralDepartment of Biologia, UNESP - São Paulo State University, IBILCE, SP, Brazil. eamaral@cvm.tamu.edu
Jason R Grant
Penny K Riggs
Nedenia B Stafuzza
Edson A Rodrigues Filho
Tom Goldammer
Rosemarie Weikard
Ronald M Brunner
Kelli J Kochan
Anthony J Greco
Jooha Jeong
Zhipeng Cai
Guohui Lin
Aparna Prasad
Satish Kumar
G Pardha Saradhi
Boby Mathew
M Aravind Kumar
Melissa N Miziara
Paola Mariani
Alexandre R Caetano
Stephan R Galvão
Madhu S Tantia
Ramesh K Vijh
Bina Mishra
S T Bharani Kumar
Vanderlei A Pelai
Andre M Santana
Larissa C Fornitano
Brittany C Jones
Humberto Tonhati
Stephen Moore
Paul Stothard
James E Womack
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Alberta · CACentre for Cellular and Molecular Biology · INNational Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources · INResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) · DEUniversidade de Brasília · BRParco Tecnologico Padano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recently constructed river buffalo whole-genome radiation hybrid panel (BBURH5000) has already been used to generate preliminary radiation hybrid (RH) maps for several chromosomes, and buffalo-bovine comparative chromosome maps have been constructed. Here, we present the first-generation whole genome RH map (WG-RH) of the river buffalo generated from cattle-derived markers. The RH maps aligned to bovine genome sequence assembly Btau_4.0, providing valuable comparative mapping information for both species.

resultsA total of 3990 markers were typed on the BBURH5000 panel, of which 3072 were cattle derived SNPs. The remaining 918 were classified as cattle sequence tagged site (STS), including coding genes, ESTs, and microsatellites. Average retention frequency per chromosome was 27.3% calculated with 3093 scorable markers distributed in 43 linkage groups covering all autosomes (24) and the X chromosomes at a LOD >or= 8. The estimated total length of the WG-RH map is 36,933 cR5000. Fewer than 15% of the markers (472) could not be placed within any linkage group at a LOD score >or= 8. Linkage group order for each chromosome was determined by incorporation of markers previously assigned by FISH and by alignment with the bovine genome sequence assembly (Btau_4.0).

conclusionWe obtained radiation hybrid chromosome maps for the entire river buffalo genome based on cattle-derived markers. The alignments of our RH maps to the current bovine genome sequence assembly (Btau_4.0) indicate regions of possible rearrangements between the chromosomes of both species. The river buffalo represents an important agricultural species whose genetic improvement has lagged behind other species due to limited prior genomic characterization. We present the first-generation RH map which provides a more extensive resource for positional candidate cloning of genes associated with complex traits and also for large-scale physical mapping of the river buffalo genome.

Indexed as

GenomeRadiation Hybrid MappingAnimalsBuffaloesCattleChromosomes, MammalianExpressed Sequence TagsGenetic MarkersGenomicsMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID19108729
PMCPMC2625372
OpenAlexW2120849673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.