Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19108712›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2008

Global gene expression analyses of bystander and alpha particle irradiated normal human lung fibroblasts: synchronous and differential responses.

Shanaz A Ghandhi, Benjamin Yaghoubian, Sally A Amundson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The transcriptomic revolution and radiation biology.International journal of radiation biology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic and transcriptomic comparison of post-radiation versus sporadic sarcomas.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shanaz A GhandhiCenter for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA. sg2423@columbia.edu
Benjamin Yaghoubian
Sally A Amundson
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

THE FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS OF BYSTANDER RESPONSESP01CA049062 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HEI, TOM K. · 1990 to 2014
$21.9M
TR&D 3P41EB002033 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BRENNER, DAVID JONATHAN · 2003 to 2018
$17.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA049062NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe existence of a radiation bystander effect, in which non-irradiated cells respond to signals from irradiated cells, is now well established. It raises concerns for the interpretation of risks arising from exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation. However, the regulatory mechanisms involved in the bystander response have not been well elucidated. To provide insight into the signaling pathways responding in bystanders, we have measured global gene expression four hours after bystander and direct alpha particle exposure of primary human lung fibroblasts.

resultsAlthough common p53-regulated radiation response genes like CDKN1A were expressed at elevated levels in the directly exposed cultures, they showed little or no change in the bystanders. In contrast, genes regulated by NFkappaB, such as PTGS2 (cyclooxygenase-2), IL8 and BCL2A1, responded nearly identically in bystander and irradiated cells. This trend was substantiated by gene ontology and pathway analyses of the microarray data, which suggest that bystander cells mount a full NFkappaB response, but a muted or partial p53 response. In time-course analyses, quantitative real-time PCR measurements of CDKN1A showed the expected 4-hour peak of expression in irradiated but not bystander cells. In contrast, PTGS2, IL8 and BCL2A1 responded with two waves of expression in both bystander and directly irradiated cells, one peaking at half an hour and the other between four and six hours after irradiation.

conclusionTwo major transcriptional hubs that regulate the direct response to ionizing radiation are also implicated in regulation of the bystander response, but to dramatically different degrees. While activation of the p53 response pathway is minimal in bystander cells, the NFkappaB response is virtually identical in irradiated and bystander cells. This alteration in the balance of signaling is likely to lead to different outcomes in irradiated cells and their bystanders, perhaps leading to greater survival of bystanders and increased risk from any long-term damage they have sustained.

Identifiers

PMID19108712
PMCPMC2627914
OpenAlexW2104280316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.