Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19108607›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2008

"It's ok, we're not cousins by blood": the cousin marriage controversy in historical perspective.

Diane B Paul, Hamish G Spencer

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Crowdsourced genealogies and genomes.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Consanguinity, human evolution, and complex diseases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diane B PaulDepartment of Political Science, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hamish G Spencer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

FamilyConsanguinityDissent and DisputesHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMarriageUnited KingdomUnited States

Identifiers

PMID19108607
PMCPMC2605922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.