Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Symposium II: vascular magnetic resonance and computed tomographic imaging.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. 3D CT to 2D X-ray image registration for improved visualization of tibial vessels in endovascular procedures.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
   Article
2. Re-assessing the enhanced permeability and retention effect in peripheral arterial disease using radiolabeled long circulating nanoparticles.Biomaterials · 2016
   Article
3. Variants of the popliteal artery terminal branches as detected by multidetector ct angiography.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2015
   Article
4. Peripheral arterial calcification: prevalence, mechanism, detection, and clinical implications.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2014
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Erratum issued

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as