Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19106276›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias

Persons with mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease managing daily activities via verbal instruction technology.

Giulio E Lancioni, Maria L La Martire, Nirbhay N Singh, Mark F O'Reilly, Jeff Sigafoos, Katia Pinto, Mauro G Minervini

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Video prompting versus other instruction strategies for persons with Alzheimer's disease.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias · 2013
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Aging society and gerontechnology: a solution for an independent living?The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2014
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giulio E LancioniUniversity of Bari, Bari, Italy. g.lancioni@psico.uniba.it
Maria L La Martire
Nirbhay N Singh
Mark F O'Reilly
Jeff Sigafoos
Katia Pinto
Mauro G Minervini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four studies assessed the effectiveness of verbal instructions presented via technology in helping persons with mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease perform daily activities. The first 2 studies were replication efforts concerning morning bathroom routine and table setting and included 4 and 2 participants, respectively. The third study targeted coffee preparation with 3 participants. The fourth study assessed maintenance and generalization of morning bathroom routine and dressing with 1 participant. Nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs served for the first 3 studies and a 5-month postintervention data collection for the fourth study. Verbal instructions for the activity steps presented via technology were effective in helping the participants of the first 3 studies reacquire basic daily activities and the participant of the fourth study retain the reacquired activities across time and settings. These results suggest that the approach reported may be a useful strategy for helping persons with Alzheimer's disease.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseBehavior TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeVerbal Behavior

Identifiers

PMID19106276
PMCPMC10846007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.