Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19105912›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2009

Risk taking in general practice: GP out-of-hours referrals to hospital.

Jenny C Ingram, Michael W Calnan, Rosemary J Greenwood, Terry Kemple, Sarah Payne, Michael Rossdale

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. What's behind the NEWS? National Early Warning Scores in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. NNTs and NNHs: essential for rational prescribing.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  12. Predicting clinical deterioration after initial assessment in out-of-hours primary care: a retrospective service evaluation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The numbers needed to inform consent?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Insecurity and risk in the consultation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jenny C IngramRDS-SW(Bristol), Education Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol. jenny.ingram@bristol.ac.uk
Michael W Calnan
Rosemary J Greenwood
Terry Kemple
Sarah Payne
Michael Rossdale

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency admissions to hospital at night and weekends are distressing for patients and disruptive for hospitals. Many of these admissions result from referrals from GP out-of-hours (OOH) providers.

aimTo compare rates of referral to hospital for doctors working OOH before and after the new general medical services contract was introduced in Bristol in 2005; to explore the attitudes of GPs to referral to hospital OOH; and to develop an understanding of the factors that influence GPs when they refer patients to hospital. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional comparison of admission rates; postal survey.

settingThree OOH providers in south-west England.

methodReferral rates were compared for 234 GPs working OOH, and questionnaires explored their attitudes to risk.

resultsThere was no change in referral rates after the change in contract or in the greater than fourfold variation between those with the lowest and highest referral rates found previously. Female GPs made fewer home visits and had a higher referral rate for patients seen at home. One-hundred and fifty GPs responded to the survey. Logistic regression of three combined survey risk items, sex, and place of visit showed that GPs with low 'tolerance of risk' scores were more likely to be high referrers to hospital (P<0.001).

conclusionGPs' threshold of risk is important for explaining variations in referral to hospital.

Indexed as

Professional PracticeAfter-Hours CareAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandFamily PracticeFemaleHospitalizationHouse CallsHumansMaleReferral and ConsultationRisk-TakingSex FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID19105912
PMCPMC2605545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.