Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19105686›Full record

Trial reportJournal of women's health (2002)

Mammography screening after risk-tailored messages: the women improving screening through education and risk assessment (WISER) randomized, controlled trial.

Joann Bodurtha, John M Quillin, Kelly A Tracy, Joseph Borzelleca, Donna McClish, Diane Baer Wilson, Resa M Jones, Julie Quillin, Deborah Bowen

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of women's health (2002). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joann BodurthaHuman and Molecular Genetics, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA. bodurtha@vcu.edu
John M Quillin
Kelly A Tracy
Joseph Borzelleca
Donna McClish
Diane Baer Wilson
Resa M Jones
Julie Quillin
Deborah Bowen
Virginia Commonwealth University · USBoston University · US

Funding

Breast Cancer Risk-Tailored Messages for More WomenR01CA094213 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI BODURTHA, JOANN NORMA · 2002 to 2006
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA094213NCI NIH HHS R01 CA94213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsA randomized trial investigated the impact of risk-tailored messages on mammography in diverse women in the Virginia Commonwealth University Health System's gynecology clinics.

methodsFrom 2003 to 2005, 899 patients > or =40 years of age were randomized to receive risk-tailored information or general information about breast health. Multiple logistic regression analyses summarize their breast health practices at 18 months.

resultsAt baseline, 576 (64%) women reported having a mammogram in the past year. At 18-month follow-up, mammography rates were 72.6% in the intervention group and 74.2% in the control group (N.S.). Women (n = 123) who reported worrying about breast cancer "often" or "all the time" had significantly higher mammography rates with the intervention (85.0%) vs. the controls (63.5%). No significant differences existed in clinical breast examination, self-examination, or mammography intentions between the two study arms. However, intervention women with lower education reported significantly fewer clinical breast examinations at follow-up.

conclusionsThe brief intervention with a risk-tailored message did not have a significant effect overall on screening at 18 months. However, among those who worried, mammography rates in the intervention group were higher. Individual characteristics, such as worry about breast cancer and education status, may impact interventions to improve breast cancer prevention practices.

Indexed as

Health EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRisk AssessmentWomen's Health ServicesAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsEducational StatusFemaleHumansIntentionMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationUniversities

Identifiers

PMID19105686
PMCPMC2945922
OpenAlexW2012538480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.