Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19105049›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2009

Estimating health utilities in patients with asthma and COPD: evidence on the performance of EQ-5D and SF-6D.

A Szende, N K Leidy, E Ståhl, K Svensson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Understanding the CRSwNP Patient as Whole.American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sleep disruption in chronic rhinosinusitis.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2017
    Review
  12. EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000-2015.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in Pompe disease.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
  15. Factors associated with quality of life measured by EQ-5D in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A SzendeCovance Market Access Services Inc., Springfield House, Hyde Street, Leeds, LS2 9LH, UK. agota.szende@covance.com
N K Leidy
E Ståhl
K Svensson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to understand systematic differences in utility values derived from the EQ-5D and the SF-6D in two respiratory populations with heterogeneous disease severity.

methodsThis study involved secondary analysis of data from two cross-sectional surveys of patients with asthma (N = 228; Hungary) and COPD (N = 176; Sweden). Disease severity was defined according to GINA and GOLD guidelines for asthma and COPD, respectively. EQ-5D and SF-6D scores and their distributional characteristics were compared across the two samples by disease severity level.

resultsWithin each patient population, mean EQ-5D and SF-6D scores were similar for the overall group and for those with moderate disease. Mean scores varied for patients with mild and severe disease. EQ-5D versus SF-6D scores in the asthma group by severity levels were 0.89 versus 0.80, 0.70 versus 0.73, 0.63 versus 0.64, and 0.51 versus 0.63, respectively. EQ-5D versus SF-6D scores in the COPD group by severity levels were 0.85 versus 0.80, 0.73 versus 0.73, 0.74 versus 0.73, and 0.53 versus 0.62, respectively.

conclusionsResults suggest the EQ-5D and SF-6D do not yield consistent utility values in patients with asthma and COPD due to differences in underlying valuation techniques and the EQ-5D's limited response options relative to mild disease.

Indexed as

AsthmaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMiddle AgedPsychometricsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.