Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19104498›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2009

Scaffold proteins and immune-cell signalling.

Andrey S Shaw, Erin L Filbert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 211 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Discussing the final size and shape of the reconstructed tissues in tissue engineering.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrey S ShawDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. ashaw@wustl.edu
Erin L Filbert
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 20 years great progress has been made in defining most of the key signalling pathways that functionally regulate immune cells. Recently, it has become clear that scaffold proteins have a crucial role in regulating many of these signalling cascades. By binding two or more components of a signalling pathway, scaffold proteins can help to localize signalling molecules to a specific part of the cell or to enhance the efficacy of a signalling pathway. Scaffold proteins can also affect the thresholds and the dynamics of signalling reactions by coordinating positive and negative feedback signals. In this Review, we focus on recent progress in the understanding of the function of scaffold proteins in immune cells.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsCalcium SignalingCarrier ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsFeedback, PhysiologicalHomer Scaffolding ProteinsHumansImmune SystemMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMicrofilament ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeurabinsProtein EngineeringProtein Structure, TertiarySignal TransductionAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCarrier ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsHomer Scaffolding ProteinsMicrofilament ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeurabins

Identifiers

PMID19104498
OpenAlexW2119756816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.