Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19104375›Full record

ReviewObstetrics and gynecology2009

Benefits and risks of oral diabetes agents compared with insulin in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review.

Wanda Nicholson, Shari Bolen, Catherine Takacs Witkop, Donna Neale, Lisa Wilson, Eric Bass

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCommentComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01998113 (Glyburide and Metformin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing These Drugs Either vs Insulin or vs Each Other.), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01998113 completedstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Glyburide and Metformin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing These Drugs Either vs Insulin or vs Each Other.

Ran2013Enrolled2,509Registered outcomes30Posted comparisons0ConditionsGestational Diabetes MellitusArmsGlyburide vs Insulin trials, Metformin vs Glyburide trials, Metformin vs Insulin trials
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wanda NicholsonFrom the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Internal Medicine, and the Johns Hopkins Evidence-based Practice Center, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of General Preventive Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Shari Bolen
Catherine Takacs Witkop
Donna Neale
Lisa Wilson
Eric Bass
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLittle is known about the comparative risks and benefits of medical treatments for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies of maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with GDM treated with oral diabetes agents compared with all types of insulin. DATA SOURCES: We searched four electronic databases from inception through January 2007. Terms for GDM, insulins, and oral hypoglycemic agents were used in the search. Two investigators independently reviewed titles and abstracts, performed data abstraction on full articles, and assessed study quality. METHOD OF STUDY SELECTION: Articles were excluded if they had no comparison group or did not use a standard diagnosis of GDM (3-hour, 100-g oral glucose tolerance test or 2-hour, 75-g oral glucose tolerance test). Nine studies met our inclusion criteria, four randomized controlled trials (n=1,229 participants) and five observational studies (n=831 participants). Data were abstracted on study characteristics, gestational age at treatment, medication dosage, and length of follow-up. Outcomes included glycemic control, infant birth weight, neonatal hypoglycemia, and congenital anomalies. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND

resultsTwo trials compared insulin to glyburide; one trial compared insulin, glyburide, and acarbose; and one trial compared insulin to metformin. No significant differences were found in maternal glycemic control or cesarean delivery rates between the insulin and glyburide groups. A meta-analysis showed similar infant birth weights between women treated with glyburide and women treated with insulin (mean difference -93 g) (95% confidence interval -191 to 5 g). There was a higher proportion of infants with neonatal hypoglycemia in the insulin group (8.1%) compared with the metformin group (3.3%) (P=.008). The rate of congenital malformations did not differ between pregnancies treated with insulin and those treated with oral agents. Observational studies were limited by selection bias and confounding.

conclusionNo substantial maternal or neonatal outcome differences were found with the use of glyburide or metformin compared with use of insulin in women with GDM.

Indexed as

AcarboseAdministration, OralBirth WeightDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGlyburideHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInfant, NewbornInsulinMetforminPregnancyAcarboseGlyburideHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetformin

Identifiers

PMID19104375
OpenAlexW2170491513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.