ArticlePhysiological measurement2009
Design of a light stimulator for fetal and neonatal magnetoencephalography.
Article in Physiological measurement, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Review on the Vagus Nerve and Autonomic Nervous System During Fetal Development: Searching for Critical Windows.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Pooled it
- The effect of halogen light stimulation on duration of ultrasound parameters of biophysical profile: a randomized clinical trial.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2018Trial
- Tracking evoked responses to auditory and visual stimuli in fetuses exposed to maternal high-risk conditions.Developmental psychobiology · 2021Article
- Comparison of halogen light and vibroacoustic stimulation on nonreactive fetal heart rate pattern.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research · 2013Article
- Habituation of visual evoked responses in neonates and fetuses: a MEG study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2012Article
- Optical characterization of cutaneous transilluminators for eye safety.Biomedical optics express · 2010Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The design, safety analysis and performance of a fetal visual stimulation system suitable for fetal and neonatal magnetoencephalography studies are presented. The issue of fetal, neonatal and maternal safety is considered and the maximum permissible exposure is computed for the maternal skin and the adult eye. The risk for neonatal eye exposure is examined. It is demonstrated that the fetus, neonate and mother are not at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.