Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19104061›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

Redundant mechanisms mediate bristle patterning on the Drosophila thorax.

Kazuya Usui, Claire Goldstone, Jean-Michel Gibert, Pat Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The wing imaginal disc.Genetics · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Regulation of theeLife · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Properties of developmental gene regulatory networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kazuya UsuiDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Claire Goldstone
Jean-Michel Gibert
Pat Simpson

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 29156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thoracic bristle pattern of Drosophila results from the spatially restricted expression of the achaete-scute (ac-sc) genes in clusters of cells, mediated by the activity of many discrete cis-regulatory sequences. However, ubiquitous expression of sc or asense (ase) achieved with a heterologous promoter, in the absence of endogenous ac-sc expression, and the activity of the cis-regulatory elements, allows the development of bristles positioned at wild-type locations. We demonstrate that the products of the genes stripe, hairy, and extramacrochaetae contribute to rescue by antagonizing the activity of Sc and Ase. The three genes are expressed in specific but overlapping spatial domains of expression that form a prepattern that allows precise positioning of bristles. The redundant mechanisms might contribute to the robustness of the pattern. We discuss the possibility that patterning in trans by antagonism is ancestral and that the positional cis-regulatory sequences might be of recent origin.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHairThoraxAnimalsBody PatterningDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticGenes, InsectNerve Tissue ProteinsTranscription Factorsase protein, DrosophilaDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsNerve Tissue Proteinssc protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19104061
PMCPMC2629283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.