Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19104024›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009

Breakthrough Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans double infection during caspofungin treatment: laboratory characteristics and implication for susceptibility testing.

Maiken Cavling Arendrup, Guillermo Garcia-Effron, Walter Buzina, Klaus Leth Mortensen, Nanna Reiter, Christian Lundin, Henrik Elvang Jensen, Cornelia Lass-Flörl, David S Perlin, Brita Bruun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. ThemBio · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Maiken Cavling ArendrupUnit of Mycology and Parasitology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen S, Denmark. mad@ssi.dk
Guillermo Garcia-Effron
Walter Buzina
Klaus Leth Mortensen
Nanna Reiter
Christian Lundin
Henrik Elvang Jensen
Cornelia Lass-Flörl
David S Perlin
Brita Bruun
Statens Serum Institut · DKRutgers New Jersey Medical SchoolInnsbruck Medical University · ATMedical University of Graz · ATRoskilde Sygehus · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Mechanism of clinical resistance to echinocandin antifungal drugsR01AI069397 · NIAID · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERLIN, DAVID S · 2007 to 2011
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS 1R01AI069397-01NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caspofungin is used for the treatment of acute invasive candidiasis and as salvage treatment for invasive aspergillosis. We report characteristics of isolates of Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus detected in a patient with breakthrough infection complicating severe gastrointestinal surgery and evaluate the capability of susceptibility methods to identify candin resistance. The susceptibility of C. albicans to caspofungin and anidulafungin was investigated by Etest, microdilution (European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing [EUCAST] and CLSI), disk diffusion, agar dilution, and FKS1 sequencing and in a mouse model. Tissue was examined by immunohistochemistry, PCR, and sequencing for the presence of A. fumigatus and resistance mutations. The MICs for the C. albicans isolate were as follows: >32 microg/ml caspofungin and 0.5 microg/ml anidulafungin by Etest, 2 microg/ml caspofungin and 0.125 microg/ml anidulafungin by EUCAST methods, and 1 microg/ml caspofungin and 0.5 microg/ml anidulafungin by CLSI methods. Sequencing of the FKS1 gene revealed a mutation leading to an S645P substitution. Caspofungin and anidulafungin failed to reduce kidney CFU counts in animals inoculated with this isolate (P > 0.05 compared to untreated control animals), while both candins completely sterilized the kidneys in animals infected with a control isolate. Disk diffusion and agar dilution methods clearly separated the two isolates. Immunohistochemistry and sequencing confirmed the presence of A. fumigatus without FSK1 resistance mutations in liver and lung tissues. Breakthrough disseminated aspergillosis and candidiasis developed despite an absence of characteristic FKS1 resistance mutations in the Aspergillus isolates. EUCAST and CLSI methodology did not separate the candin-resistant clinical isolate from the sensitive control isolate as well as did the Etest and agar methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisAspergillus fumigatusCandida albicansCandidiasisCaspofunginColony Count, MicrobialEchinocandinsHumansImmunohistochemistryInjections, IntraperitonealLipopeptidesMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsLipopeptides

Identifiers

PMID19104024
PMCPMC2650576
OpenAlexW2132497565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.