Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19103598›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2009

Structure-based ligand design and the promise held for antiprotozoan drug discovery.

William N Hunter

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Two high-resolution structures of the human E3 ubiquitin ligase Siah1.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Structure of Leishmania major cysteine synthase.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

William N HunterDivision of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, United Kingdom. w.n.hunter@dundee.ac.uk
University of Dundee · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust 082596Wellcome Trust 083481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of the pharmaceutical industry, driven by progress in chemistry, biology, and technology, ranks as one of the most successful of human endeavors. However, serious health problems persist, among which are diseases caused by protozoan parasites, largely ignored in modern times. Advances in genomic sciences, molecular and structural biology, and computational and medicinal chemistry now set the scene for a renewed assault on such infections. A structure-centric approach to support discovery of antiparasitic compounds promises much. Current strategies and benefits of a structure-based approach to support early stage drug discovery will be described.

Indexed as

Antiparasitic AgentsDrug DesignGenome, ProtozoanProtozoan InfectionsAnimalsComputational BiologyEukaryotaHumansPharmacology, ClinicalStructure-Activity RelationshipAntiparasitic Agents

Identifiers

PMID19103598
PMCPMC2673241
OpenAlexW2002199686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.